VaccinationsandSIDS.com
"Military men are just dumb stupid animals to be used as
pawns in foreign policy."
SOURCE:
Henry
Kissinger, quoted in "Kiss the Boys Goodbye: How the United
States Betrayed Its Own POW's in Vietnam"
-
The American Free Press dropped a “dirty bomb” on
the Pentagon by reporting that eight out of 20 men
who served in one unit in the 2003 U.S. military
offensive in Iraq now have malignancies. That means
that 40 percent of the soldiers in that unit have
developed malignancies in just 16 months.
-
Terry Jemison of the Department of Veterans Affairs
reported this week to the American Free Press that
“Gulf-era veterans” now on medical disability since
1991 number 518,739, with only 7,035 reported
wounded in Iraq in that same 14-year period.
Read
more at
http://www.sfbayview.com/081804/Depleteduranium081804.shtml
or click
here.
Israel
does not force its military to take
anthrax vaccine. Neither does France. Neither does England.
No country in Europe or Asia forces this vaccine on its
soldiers.
The
ongoing inoculation of military personnel with smallpox, anthrax, and others is purely that of scientific
experimentation before such vaccines are introduced or
re-introduced to the general public. Neither smallpox or
anthrax have ever been used by the enemies of the United
States as the Pentagon alleges the case could be before each
war we've engaged in. We are approaching the governments
schedule for when the hideously deadly anthrax and smallpox
vaccines will be recommended for the general
public....without the right to informed consent.
AND WHY IS THIS ON THE
"WHAT YOUR PEDIATRICIAN DOESN'T TELL YOU" website?
Parents of highschoolers desiring to enlist in the military
need to have this information at their fingertips. Don't
turn away. Read all the historical and present risk
factors. Far too many military personnel have been rushed
to urgent care on account of a stroke and other adverse
reactions to the anthrax vaccines. Even more disturbing,
countless family members have lost their husbands, wives,
fathers,mothers, sons and or daughters to the deadly
cocktail. Within 18 months, military personnel are
inoculated with a total of 6 doses. More dangerous, it's
another inoculation every year after. There is no safety
data on which this guideline is based.
Purely experimental.
Don't let what has happened to thousands of service members
happen to you or yours looking to enlist. Be sure to read
the listed adverse reactions on the
product insert and other information.
Anthrax Vaccine Facts
The Government Doesn't Want You to Know
1. According to the
FDA product information leaflet, NO scientific studies have
been performed on the Anthrax Vaccine to determine if it
causes cancer.
2. According to the
FDA product information leaflet, NO scientific studies have
been performed on the Anthrax Vaccine to determine if it has
any effect on fertility. This applies to both males and
females. It is NOT known if this drug will effect your
fertility or, if successful in conceiving, the fetus.
3. According to the
FDA product information leaflet, NO scientific studies have
been performed on the Anthrax Vaccine to determine if it
will protect you from inhaled anthrax spores.
4. According to the
U. S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases
of Fort Detrick, MD, there is NO scientific evidence to
suggest that this vaccine will protect you from aerosolized
anthrax.
5. A principal
chemical component of the Anthrax Vaccine, formaldehyde, is
not approved for human consumption according to the U. S.
Government Material Data Safety Sheet. (This is also in
childhood "recommended" vaccines)
6. A principal
chemical component of the Anthrax Vaccine, benzethonium
chloride, has not been evaluated for human consumption
according to the U. S. Government.
7. The one and only
facility licensed to produce the Anthrax Vaccine has been
cited by the FDA for quality control problems (Bioport)
8. On March 3 1998,
Secretary Cohen mandated (Sec Def Briefing No. 094-98)
"supplemental testing, consistent with Food and Drug
Administration standards, to assure sterility, safety,
potency and purity of the vaccine," before further
immunizations take place. These tests were ordered because
the lab was having quality control problems. These tests did
NOT further evaluate the vaccine to see if it causes cancer
or impairs fertility, they only assured the vaccine met the
FDA approved guidelines.
9. Most physicians
know very little about the vaccine, other than what they are
told by the government in preparation for implementation of
this program.
10. There are a number
of common reasons NOT to take the vaccine. Read the product
information leaflet and talk to your civilian doctor.
10
Questions To Ask Your Doctor
Before You Take The Anthrax Vaccine
- I request a copy
of the Anthrax Vaccine product advisory leaflet that
comes in the box with the vaccine?
- In the product
advisory leaflet's REFERENCES paragraph, "These
recommendations are prepared by the Michigan Department
of Public Health only for the guidance of the
physician. They do not replace the experience and
judgement of the physician, who should be familiar with
the pertinent medical literature before administering
any biologic product." Can you summarize your recent
readings on the vaccine and explain any new
developments?
- What gaurantee is
there that I will not develop an auto immune or chronic
illness shortly after inoculation?
- Could you
summarize the studies performed on the anthrax vaccine's
potential carcinogenic effects?
- The vaccine's
advisory leaflet says in the paragraph labeled
PRECAUTIONS, the vaccine might affect reproduction
capacity. What are the vaccine's potential effect on
fertility?
- The advisory
leaflet says nothing about the vaccine's ability to
protect me from inhaled exposure to the anthrax
bacteria. So, how do YOU know this still has the
potential to protect me?
- What is your
understanding of anthrax and it's use as a weapon?
- What can you tell
me about the long term effects?
- Have you
personally completed the 18 month course of shots which
constitute the FDA approved anthrax vaccination
program? If not, why?
- On March 3 1998,
Secretary Cohen mandated (Sec Def Briefing No. 094-98)
"supplemental testing, consistent with Food and Drug
Administration standards, to assure sterility, safety,
potency and purity of the vaccine," before further
immunizations take place. Do you have the unedited
results of these additional tests for me to review
before receiving the vaccine?
Summary
of the 2/20/98 FDA Inspection Report
on the Michigan Biological Products Institute
[All Anthrax Vaccine
produced for U. S. use is manufactured by this lab. The FDA
recently issued a notice of intent to revoke the license of
the lab’s governing body, a research arm of the University
of Michigan.]
Summary of the 2/20/98
FDA Inspection Report on the MBPI [Michigan Biologic
Products Institute, Lansing, Michigan], Meryl Nass, M.D. May
19, 1998
Essentially all the
issues in the report have to do with grossly inadequate
quality control. However, it appears that the production
process was carried out in a particularly cavalier manner,
as if the product would never be used on human beings, and
was being manufactured solely to meet production quotas.
The issue of how MBPI was allowed to carry on despite repeat
violations of standards over many years is another story;
here I am trying only to list in a brief but comprehensible
manner the issues enumerated in the FDA's report.
1. MBPI did not test
the suitability of their own procedures, nor validate them:
a. storage times for bulk anthrax preparations in tanks
lasted from a week to 4 months, before filling of
containers;
b. mixing times not standardized; the product settles
quickly in the tank and homogeneity of the suspension has
not been demonstrated;
c. testing for contamination was sporadic;
d. the sporicide used was not validated;
e. sublots are held for 3 years or longer before being used
in a lot (Stability data to support this hold time do not
exist);
f. the filters used to harvest the vaccine were neither
validated nor integrity tested prior to August, 1997;
g. validation of microbial retention by the filters was
performed using inappropriate media, used for production of
tetanus, not anthrax;
h. there is no validation of cleaning for the equipment
which is in contact with the vaccine materials;
i. "there is no documentation of testing for
container/closure integrity or container/closure
compatibility for periods up to seven years."
2. Inadequate
analytical methods:
a. the reference standard used for potency testing was from
a lot produced in 1991;
b. "the analytical methods for determination of *** and ***
in anthrax vaccine are not validated with respect to
accuracy, precision, linearity, specificity and limit of
detection;"
c. "potency testing of anthrax vaccine requires either
testing one finished product vial, an aliquot from the
formulated bulk tank, or a pilot bulk sample. There are no
data demonstrating that these samples are representative of
the lot."
3. Lack of written
operating procedures:
a. for examination, rejection and disposition of anthrax
sublots;
b. for redating expired vaccine to extend the expiration
period; Example: Lot FAV023 was tested twice for redating
(presumably potency) and twice for stability in 1997 and
failed all tests. It was scheduled to be retested for
redating on 4/21/98.
c. for time limits for which product can be exposed to room
temperature;
d. "The firm's SOP (standard operating procedure) for
handling manufacturing deviations/departures does not
address when a lot should be monitored on stability."
4. Inadequate testing
procedures:
a.sublots are tested when produced, but not retested prior
to formulation, which may occur several years later;
b. Test results are reported as "unsatisfactory" or "no
test", indicating an invalid test, apparently in addition to
frank "failed" results. What do these results mean, and
are lots with these designations used or retested?
5. Quarantined
materials (what precisely is meant by quarantined? Failed
testing?
a. These are held for extended periods; examples are given
of a sublot quarantined in 1992 which was held, and only
destroyed in 1997 due to mold contamination;
b. Other sublots failed potency tests but are still held in
quarantine.
6. Expiration dates:
a. "expiration dates are assigned based on the latest valid
potency test. There is no correlation between this date and
formulation of bulk or filling of the finished product;"
b. expired vaccine lots are "redated", based only on another
potency test. There is no analytic testing identifying and
demonstrating the absence of degradants;
c. "there are no expiration dates for the working spore
concentrations (virulent or avirulent strains)."
7. Labelling issues:
a. anthrax lots approved by CBER for redating are given
alternate lot numbers to indicate they have been redated.
However, MBPI has used the original lot numbers for
labelling, thus concealing the fact that the lot was
"redated;"
b. "for anthrax vaccine lots #FAV008 through #FAV016, the
firm unpacked the vials from the cartons and removed the
labels...the firm does not have documentation of performing
reconciliation of the vials before and after this
operation." [Does this mean the labels were removed and
replaced with new labels and reused? Why?]
8. Stability testing:
a. testing for stability only began in 1997;
b. "stability testing consists only of performing release
tests at various intervals;" (What is a release test?)
c. stability testing does not address product degradation;
d. "there is no justification for putting lots manufactured
as early as 1991 into the stability program;"
e. "the firm does not have a system in place to investigate
and report stability failures."
9. Use of vaccine lots
that failed testing. Several examples:
a. lot FAV011 was filled on 10/17/91, redated in 1994, and
again retested in 1997. Its potency rating was 11 ppm,
below the lower accepted limit, but the lot was not rejected
nor placed in quarantine;
b. lot FAV023 was filled on 12/13/94. It failed 3 potency
tests in 1997, yet was retested for a 4th time in 10/97,
where it was listed as passing by 0.01. There was no
investigation into the earlier results or justification for
the additional testing;
c. "lot FAV016 had 6570 vials rejected due to particulates
during post filling inspection. These particulates were not
identified, nor was an investigation conducted. The batch
was released;"
d. sublots AV383 and AV390 failed original sterility tests,
but passed on repeat testing. It appears that such sublots
were included in bulk lots. Part of the report is missing
here.
10. Sterility:
a. after harvest from the holding tank, including transfer
of sublots to different buildings, samples were not placed
on media "to validate aseptic manufacturing after harvest;"
b. "lot FAV035 had 409 vials rejected for faulty closure
during post filling inspection; There was no investigation
conducted."
c. When environmental monitoring indicates that
environmental action limits are exceeded, the firm's
procedures do not require that additional cleaning and
increased sampling be performed.
11. Missing sections
of the report:
a. my copy lacks part of section 9 until section 16;
Sections 20 through 25 are completely whited out.
Elsewhere, many words and names are whited out as well.
Things
you can do to force the government to accept
responsibility for the possible negative effects of the
vaccine.
If you have less than
18 months remaining on active duty
-Insist on being
exempted from the vaccine to which you do have the right as
a military personnel
- insist the
government sign a written agreement to incur all travel
expenses required to give you the FULL 18 month vaccination
series. (The ONLY way the drug is FDA approved is if it is
given according to the 18 month schedule).
- Insist the
government provide a written statement of purpose for
administering the vaccine.
- Insist your case be
reviewed by a medical review board prior to being punished
for "failure to obey a lawful written order."
- Consider objecting
to the vaccine on religious grounds
- Insist the
government sign a written statement acknowledging the drug
has not been tested for its carcinogenic effects or
potential impairment of fertility; acknowledging the drug
has not been tested for its ability to protect you from
aerosolized (inhaled) anthrax exposure (This is the primary
reason DoD says you need the vaccine. In that respect, the
vaccine is experimental since it’s ability to protect you
has not been proven); agreeing to pay for all medical
expenses relating to any future instance of cancer you may
develop; agreeing to pay for all medical expenses relating
to any future instance of infertility you may experience.
- Write your
Congressman or Senator.
-find your Congressman
or Senator at
http://www.hoboes.com/html/Politics/electednet/
NEVER GIVE IN unless
you honestly don't feel there is concern.
The
military does not have the legal right to
force inoculation of biochemical agents of which there is
little understanding of it's safety and efficacy. The only
explanation they'll never admit to you is that they
(Pentagon) spent millions of dollars to have this
administered to military personnel under the guise of
"protection". The Anthrax vaccine is simply an
experimentation for which you are a subject as they look to
find something to possibly inflict on their own enemies in
the future, without providing service members or the
public any definitive reason to believe "the threat"
from America's enemies is even real.
They rant and rave there is a threat....but there are more
questions than there are answers.
|