Reality, Belief and The Mind (section 2)
by Gene Zimmer
Attention
Whatever has attention placed upon it has a tendency to persist and perpetuate for the
person or people placing the attention. If you place attention on positive things,
encourage them, and attempt to build, that which is receiving the attention has a tendency
to come about. Conversely, if attention is placed upon the negative such as disease,
"mental disorders", crime or immorality, even with the intention to stop it or
inhibit it, it tends to also persist and perpetuate, because it is receiving the
attention. This is another reason why attempting to destroy things tends to fail. The
attention upon the undesirable thing acts to make it persist. This is an observable fact.
Understanding this requires looking and being honest with what one finds through
one's own observation. You will never deduce this by "thinking", logic or
reasoning. "Thinking" is primarily playing with concepts in your head, whereas
as "looking" is simply observing what is. Of course, most people
"think" so much, and "think" so chronically every second of every day,
that they are quite incapable of calmly setting anywhere and accurately observing what is
sitting there right in front of them.
Materialism, Modernism, and Science
While this previously mentioned situation of indoctrination into any time period's
limited and unique set of views does exist for all people, at all places and in all times,
it exists in a unique way for the "educated", and especially for the
"highly educated" people. This presents an interesting situation where the
graduates of the "best" schools are considered to be the smartest, brightest,
and end up as leaders of government, medicine and industry, but who also ironically suffer
from the greatest inability to break out of whatever the current professional and cultural
framework is. True, part of their unwillingness or inability to question their own beliefs
stem from the basic profit motive. They benefit financially, personally and socially by
believing and practicing what they do. But they also usually believe it too. This
becomes very important when certain views, ideas and beliefs are incomplete, biased, wrong
or harmful to people and society. This situation exists today, in many areas, at the
beginning of a new millennium.
Today the general cultural and professional framework is "humanism",
"materialism" and "science". Everybody "believes" it, has
been indoctrinated into it, but especially the "elite", "very rich"
and "highly educated" endlessly promote it and adamantly believe it. When
I say "science" I do not mean the "scientific method", which is an
intelligent way to determine the validity of anything. The word "science" refers
here to the various disciplines and fields which have arisen from the purported use of the
"scientific method" in the social sciences such as psychology,
psychiatry, sociology, economics, and politics. People have an almost mystical connotation
attached to the word "science". It is not dissimilar to the religious feeling of
faith. It seems to explain all manner of things to most people, while generally they don't
have the slightest understanding of what makes something "scientific" (i.e.
based upon the strict application of the scientific method involving proper theorizing,
testing, model making, observation of results, adjustment of theories, and so on). The
currently established results of supposed science in the social sciences such as
psychiatry and sociology, while having very little to do with any honest scientific method
and filled with incorrect basic axioms, opinions, and biases, are accepted as part of
modern "science", and anything falling outside of their strictly defined domains
are viewed as "not science", "quackery", "weird" or plain
"wrong". Smart advertisers attempt to attach the idea of "science" or
"scientific" to their products and ad campaigns because they know how most
people unconsciously favor anything presented as "scientific" (whether it truly
is or isn't).
In this essay I will attempt to show that these "modern" ideas and views
about reality are no superior to any other worldview that has existed at any time
throughout history, despite the arguments of their proponents. This is not an easy thing
to do because people generally are quite rigidly "stuck" in their current
worldview of reality. A major characteristic of the people who hold a
"worldview" (which we all do in some way and to some degree) is that they are
quite unable to view reality from outside their clearly defined and meaningful
framework. The person holding the modern worldview believes it completely, can
look back in history and can easily discuss the errors of past worldviews, but cannot
notice that he or she is also just another "believer" in a similar type
worldview. Although differing in content, one's modern worldview functions in exactly the
same way as all those they look back upon and correctly criticize and find fault with.
If you are a college graduate, you are probably thinking that this doesn't apply to
you. Actually, this applies to you completely. And this is even more true for the
graduates and Ph.D.s of Harvard, Yale, Brown, Princeton, and so on. Now, if you are
a graduate of one of these, then you are probably now smirking, and condescendingly
thinking to yourself how incorrect I must be. Please read on, if you have the strength of
character, any sense of truth left within you, and the slightest ability to question your
own basic views and assumptions about reality.
Ideas versus Reality
The majority of people, especially "intelligent" people, think in terms of
unique concepts, specific ideas, and numerous abstractions. That's fine and as it must be.
Everything has a name, or a label; things are categorized into types and generics based
upon similarities; perceived differences in quality and quantity enable us to keep things
separated from each other (at least in our own minds). Realize this is primarily a
"mental" function that we humans as minds apply to reality around us, and
has little to do with "reality" itself. The world of abstraction, concepts,
ideas and meaning exists only inside of your mind. It has no independent
existence anywhere else.
When you call an actual physical tree a "tree", the word or concept is
assumed to "be the tree", but it is not anything of the sort. In fact you know
very little about that tree you might be thinking of or looking at. You have no idea of
the number of branches, texture of the leaves, color of the buds, depth of the roots,
thickness of the bark, operation of mineral nourishment, photosynthesis and on and on for
a tremendous variety of the trees characteristics and functions. You may have ideas
about it, but they are vague at best. Even more to the truth, even if I gave you a full
day, you would still not "know the tree". You could strip off bark, slice into
stems, dig for roots, observe leaves under a magnifying glass, and count spring buds, but
in the end, you wouldn't have achieved the goal of truly "knowing that tree".
You wouldn't understand the "pattern" or "active agency" which resides
in a seed and acts to manifest as the tree and keeps the tree functioning as tree, just as
that specific tree and tree type, and nothing else, throughout its life.
We mainly see and experience things, at an often very superficial level, give them and
the various relationships among these things "names" or "labels",
attach personal meaning and significance to these various things, and happily go about our
business.
Most people think in terms of symbols and labels for the objects and relationships
between the actual objects of reality. They take the "idea" to be the thing and
work mentally with these concepts about the things of reality alone, usually paying
little attention to how closely these concepts or ideas accurately
relate to actual observable things. These concepts are usually far from equal to
the actual realities they involve and correspond to. And sadly, most people never actually
deal with reality or other people directly because they never can get past dealing
with their own unique and generally severely limited "ideas about" reality and
other people. Do you get the difference? Its a big difference. People's ideas about
reality (names, labels, concepts, abstractions), and there own personal meanings
about all these things, have much more to do with what is going on in life than any actual
understanding of the true nature of the various things or some supposed "objective
reality". Add to this the fact that much of what passes as "knowledge" is
intentional or unintentional misinformation, and the entire situation becomes very
difficult to confront. This requires further explanation to adequately get across an idea
of just how wide a gulf exists between "things" and the "ideas about
things" which all people connect and attach to these things.
Some examples will serve us well.
1) A man recently had an argument with his wife. He is thinking continuously about how
rotten she is, how she cheated on him, how she is so uncaring, and what he plans to say to
her. He has all these "ideas" going round and round in his head. He never really
looks at or understands her. In fact, he never has in the four years he has been with her.
He understands and thinks with his "ideas" about her, or how he conceives
her to be. True, there is some relationship between what he thinks her to be and what she
is and does, but there is also much which is purely of the nature of "ideas"
about her that are vague, generalized, exaggerated, and also just incorrect. There is a
huge gulf between the two, what she really is and what his ideas are of her.
So when he gets home, he yells and verbally attacks her, and still never looks at or sees
"her". He sees her through his own unique set of ideas of what he conceives her
to be and what he imagines she should be. Its like his ideas, concepts, beliefs,
and notions (i.e. his general viewpoint) act as a filter to his perception and
experience, only allowing him to see and experience a small aspect of her (which may not
even be a true aspect at all). We all have this going on to some degree about everything
we live, see and experience.
2) A college student is studying basic electrical circuits. He has read all about
"current", "voltage" and "resistance". In a lab experiment
he sets up a simple circuit with a battery, some wire, and a resistor (an electrical
component which inhibits electrical current flow). When he connects it all together, he
takes some readings using a voltmeter, ammeter and ohmmeter. He then sees how the voltage,
current and resistance are all related. He smiles with his new understanding of
electricity. What is really going on here? He never "saw" a voltage, or a
current or an electrical resistance. He never touched or heard any of these. Even today,
nobody really knows what electricity is. Theories continue to change, but always,
and at any time, these are just theories about phenomena of perception and experience.
Some people think we, as a civilization, are moving "forward" and
"advancing" the theories about the world around us, are getting "closer and
closer to the truth" about electricity, energy and reality. That's wrong. That's
totally wrong. There is rarely any advancement. There is only change and differences in
human concepts and notions about reality. What there is actually is just
another theory, and it is no better and no worse. It is simply just an alternative
mental construct, set of ideas, concepts, or notions. Over the past 10,000 years the
entire universe has stayed basically and exactly the same. The only change has
been man's ideas about it. The world here on Earth, including the form of
civilization, has changed only according to Man's ideas about himself and the
world.
The idea about the thing can never and will never be the thing itself! All ideas and
concepts must, of necessity, fall short of the thing itself. The only way to truly
understand something or to truly know something is to be it, and to be it completely.
Geniuses such as Einstein or DaVinci probably had their moments of "becoming"
the object(s) of their contemplation. They, for a moment, saw it all in an instantaneous
flash of total understanding, and thereafter spent thousands of hours trying to put into
words and communicate to others what they had seen in that brief moment of illumination.
Einstein probably was a photon, speeding through space at the speed of
light, feeling space bend as he neared large suns, experiencing catastrophic amounts of
electrons changing potentials and bursting free as mass converted to energy. It is
interesting to note that religious mystics undergo the same problem when they attempt to
communicate what they experienced when they "became one with the universe",
"one with God", or "one with their Self" (not much difference between
these actually
). Possibly, instead of spending all their time trying to communicate
what they saw and experienced, they might better have spent their time teaching others how
to gain the ability of "being" other things, relationships and energies at will.
Although, most likely few ever realized that this is what occurred in the first place.
People could then "understand" by their own personal direct experience. This
would solve many problems with communication. Of course, if we could all do that sort of
thing all of the time then there would be no use for communication or much of anything
else.
3) Maggie is walking home from school thinking about how her Grandma promised to make a
cake with her after school today. She imagines getting the eggs, cracking them into a
bowl, pouring in the milk, adding the sugar, mixing it all up, pouring it into a mold, and
finally placing it in the oven. There is much activity occurring in little Maggies
mind. We all have extensive activity occurring within our minds. For all of us, to some
degree, these various thoughts, ideas, notions and imaginings are mostly pale reflections,
in vividness, detail and continuity, of past, present or future external realities.
Memories are remembered, the present is considered, the future is decided upon, feared or
looked forward to. Sometimes these are detailed, but more often than not, these are part
verbal (i.e. mental talking to oneself using the symbolic labels we each have given
everything we find around us) and part faint imagery. All of this is continually parading
itself across the landscape of our inner mental space. It is an interesting exercise for
anyone to try to spend 10 minutes a day for a week or two attempting to quietly observe,
without interfering, the nature and content of one's own mind. Obviously, what I am
discussing here is something different than intellectual mental "concepts" and
"abstractions", and falls more under the realm of imagination and fantasy. While
this is true, my point is to get the reader to view in another way just how an
"idea" or "thing of the mind" is not the thing it refers to,
and often is of much less quality, quantity, character, detail and vividness than the
objects and relationships of external reality the ideas correspond to or are supposed to
describe and define. Maggie may not be thinking in words or language at all, and may be
simply picturing out the entire anticipated event. This can be totally devoid of
conceptualization as an intellectual process of thinking with ideas.
What any human mind does do completely though is attach meaning, significance
and purpose to everything it finds around itself and involves itself with. There is no
meaning outside of any individual's own creation of it. The creation of meaning and
the attachment of significance to aspects of one's life, and inner and external reality is
a function of a mind. Only a mind attaches meaning. Meaning doesn't reside
in anything "out there". It is bestowed upon things by conscious
thinking entities alone whether the object of the bestowing be one's personal hobby,
business, family, friends, club, government, cite, county, state, country, investments,
goals or religion. This may seem heretical to some who are strongly religious, but even if
God, Christ, Buddha or Mohammed is ultimately the most vital and real thing in the
universe, this is meaningless unless a specific individual mind considers it to be so.
Meaning is created and given to things by Man alone. Only conscious, aware beings do
this. Attaching or bestowing meaning is a function of consciousness. It is a function of
an aware mind. It is not a physical or biological process. Human beings should
learn to begin paying attention to what he or she believes in, and attaches purpose and
meaning to. It is not all accidental, fixed, environmentally determined or a matter of
natural personal genetics or social evolution. We each have a choice and it is our own
complete personal decision alone what we decide is important, and should receive our
meaning and purpose. The idea of "values", what we each value as important,
valid, desirable, right and wrong, comes into play here, and the establishing and
maintaining of values is another function of a mind. Ideally, one's choice of meaning
and value is a conscious and self-determined activity. This is often difficult though,
because there are so many forces about us attempting to sell us on their own unique set of
beliefs, purposes, meaning, values and opinions. Also, there are only a limited number of pre-packaged
belief systems (interconnecting and reasonably consistent systems of meaning, belief and
concepts) generally available for the public's acceptance at any time and place within any
extant reality (such as any fixed location on Earth).
4) Exercise 1:
Purpose: To get an "feel for", direct experience of, or awareness of the
difference between being or knowing something and thinking or knowing about
it with concepts and ideas.
Details: Choose any simple object such as a glass, cup, key, wrench, cigarette, etc.
You can choose anything but keep it fairly simple and small. Look at it for a few seconds.
Consider its size, shape, color, weight, location and texture. Think about these things.
Consider its similarity to other similar objets of the same type. Think about these
similarities for a few moments. Consider how it is different from other objects in the
area. Think about these things.
Spend a few moments thinking about how your "ideas" about it are actually
ideas only and not the thing itself.
Now, simply sit there, look at the object, and perceive it. Allow it to fill your
attention. Wallow in it to the exclusion of all else. Just look at it. See it. Perceive
it. If thoughts intrude upon your awareness, either thoughts about the object or entirely
different thoughts, gently stop them by withdrawing your contribution to the thoughts.
Don't resist, fight or try to force the thoughts to stop. Comfortably cease having the
thoughts and continue to be there with the object. Allow the object to pervade your
attention to the exclusion of all else. Perceiving, observing and looking are very
different from thinking and conceptualizing.
If you do this for awhile, or even for a number of days in a row, you will come to have
a better understanding of the difference between "ideas about things" and the
actual "things". There is a huge difference. You won't ever truly
understand this through talking about it, thinking about it, or imagining about it. Only direct
personal experience can supply the awareness of the difference. In this exercise you
must use your attention and awareness, both sadly under used commodities,
and not your ability to think or conceptualize. These are very different
things. There is a limitation with all words, concepts, discussions, book reading, and
intellectual endeavors. While these do all have their place and purpose, and we couldn't
really get along without them, these do not and cannot ever impart complete understanding
of anything. If the reading, thinking or discussing doesn't encourage and prompt you to look
and perceive actualities out in the world around you or in your inner world, then
they are really useless. While this is completely true, it is not taught, much
less even mentioned in a practical way, within the confines of what passes as "modern
education". "Reason" and "thinking" reign supreme in official
modern academia. These two things are only parts of any mind, and lower
in function than awareness, knowing and looking. Reason and thinking
both involve concepts and ideas only. It largely involves playing with significances
about things, with the thinker rarely realizing that the concepts and ideas never are
or can equal the things they supposedly refer to. The concepts and ideas can approach the
thing or relationship they refer to, but for most people, most of the time, the gulf
between the two is tremendous.
Any philosophy student, or professor, would gain much by honestly doing these
exercises, as he would come to a better personal understanding of the difference between thought
and reality, and their relationship. Numerous philosophy courses, book learning,
and intellectual gymnastics cannot supplant direct experience. The intellect has its value
and use, and it is beneficial to exercise the intellectual muscle. Subjects such
as logic, mathematics and philosophy are great for this, but most people involved in these
subjects take them much too seriously, and don't realize they are simply playing mental
games with words, significance and meaning. Most philosophers forever remain mental
and intellectual, and never figure out or know there are ways to directly
experience all they argue about and pontificate over. Of course, if they did this they
would all be out of a job. No one would take them seriously, and considering the results
of most modern philosophy this would probably not be such a serious loss.
This is the value of certain techniques of Yoga, meditation, Scientology, visualization
and even practical magic. They can deliver direct experiences and the resultant knowledge
doesn't depend upon words, intellectual concepts or ideas. Some of these methods actually
address entirely different aspects and functions of the human mind, aspects and functions
that are completely ignored by the extant western subjects of psychology. Sadly, too often
these subjects are tied up with various religious ideas and metaphysical absurdities that
are, in fact, not necessary to an understanding or application of the basic ideas, and
this tendency alienates many people before they ever have a chance to get started with
these subjects.
Exercise 2:
Purpose: To get a further distinction between mental ideas and actual
things.
Details: Choose a sign with a written word on it, or write a word on a piece of paper.
Do the same exercise as explained above. When you reach a point where you cease to see
any meaning to the words and the letters themselves become nonsensical forms, then you
have achieved an experience of the thing separate from your own ideas,
significances and notions you have attached to it. Notice that initially when you look at
a word or a sign, the interpretation occurs instantly. You may mentally speak the
word in your mind or perceive it automatically with whatever meaning the letters
or symbol has for you. You do this with everything around you and this involves
an incredible number of associations between things and your own personal
definitions, meaning and significances relating to these things. If you do this
exercise until completion as described, you will have a very good idea of just how much
your own ideas contribute to reality, and how little is actually there by itself. This may
take 10 minutes, an hour, weeks or months. If you say, "it didn't work", it only
means that you failed to do it until it did. Those of you who are more intellectual,
worship reason, and tend to rigid conceptualizing will have a harder time at
this. Reason, intellect, and conceptualizing are necessary, vital, and useful, but
they are only part of a much larger picture of what a human mind does and is
capable of. Too often, the products of reason are assumed to be all there is. Reason
applied to a detailed examination of the physical universe gave us materialism. It's only
a partial understanding utilizing only a partial aspect of any mind.
If you continued down this path, with methods and techniques I haven't the
time to delineate, you could probably reach a point where you could recognize and
completely experience how all reality, as you experience it, in
every way, is completely and only dependent on your own viewpoint, notions, and
convictions about it. This wouldn't be an idea, or concept, but a practical experience. It
would be above the intellect, actual, true, and not hallucination or imagination. It would
probably be termed mystical, but actually is simply the case of you being there
without all one's own personal mental associations about everything you see, have seen and
will see. This is the goal of certain techniques of meditation although even these
subjects themselves often err by attaching themselves theoretically to ideas of God or
cosmic consciousness. This can result in a tremendous personal experience of awe,
clarity, expansiveness and understanding. But there is really nothing mystical
about it. You would have just suddenly found yourself in direct communication with things
without any attached personal meaning or significance to or about these things. This can
include your experience of a small pebble, a stick, a leaf, a sun or the physical universe
from one end to the other. It can also include the experience of your own mind, awareness,
or consciousness separate from all objects and associations with the objects of usual
experience. Any thing can be the object of such direct experience or awareness.
The goal is not to forever destroy all meaning and significance in one's life. This has
often been the approach of various Eastern religions, to deny self completely and all
one's personal mental involvement with all inner and outer reality. But doing
this can be very therapeutic and can deliver to one a first hand experience and
knowledge of how large a part each person's individual mind plays in the creation and
experience of their own personal life and perception of reality. The aim is to enable
personal control over one's own mental activity, a control that is all but non-existent
today and has been for the majority of people throughout human history.
5) Ask most people the question, "why do things fall to the ground?", and
they respond, "because of gravity". But ask them, "what does gravity
mean?", and they tell you, "well, the law that things fall". The word
"gravity" means, to most people, "things fall to the ground when
released from a higher position". The label or term "gravity" is defined as
meaning, "things fall to the ground". FACT: Things fall to the ground because
things fall to the ground. That's really the understanding, derived from direct
personal experience, most people have. Gravity has the definition of "things fall to
the ground". The "label" gravity imparts a sense of understanding to many
people, which is quite non-existent. People think that making up some invisible force
called gravity sufficiently explains why things fall to the ground. To this day nobody
anywhere has the slightest clue why things fall. The truth, based upon perception, is that
things fall. All else is make believe, theorizing and cute games of imagination. People
can even talk about this, thinking they actually are discussing something. In fact, they
are only playing with words and meanings. Do you see? The truth is that we each experience
things falling to the ground. That is what we truly KNOW. But any explanation or
understanding is largely and primarily only in our minds. It's a concept of
something which really explains and perceives little except what we already directly
experience - things fall when dropped. Concepts and the actual realities they
relate to are rarely equivalent, and more often than not, are quite different.
The educated scientist will argue, "but the real theory of gravity involves mass
and the attraction power of large masses". Maybe he will also someday figure out that
however advanced his notions, ultimately it is only an "idea" about something he
experiences. There is a true reason why gravity exists, and why everything else
exists as it does. I discuss this in detail below.
There are many concepts we all hold about all types of things which actually are only definitions,
yet we each believe ourselves to possess "understanding" because we have
"named", "labeled" and "defined" something. In the middle of
December In New York City someone says "it's cold today", and a friend responds,
"of course it is, it's Winter". They each think they "understand"
something. Winter is defined as a time when it's cold. Of course it's cold! Billy
falls off his bike and hurts his knees. His mother explains, "oh you just had an
accident", and both Billy and his mother feel better. But "accident" means
having something happen which you didn't plan which usually has bad results. Again, it's
talking and thinking in circles about nothing. And we even get emotional responses from
this mental and verbal charade! A man robs the corner store and a group of people discuss
how "he is just a criminal". They all "understand". But a
"thief" is by definition a criminal. Where's the actual explanation or
understanding? I could give hundreds of examples. Life is riddled with this type
"thinking". There can be more in depth understanding of causes, but this
is rarely the case. It tends to be very superficial, incomplete and largely arbitrary
regarding any individual's dealing with the objects (or concepts) of life and reality.
6) Racist, oppressive religious activities and domineering nationalistic movements all
suffer dramatically from these same problems where reality has little to do with what the
members of these groups think about it. The bigot sees thieves in every black person. He
never correctly sees that black people, like any people, have the same usual goals as
anyone else - happiness, success, peace of mind, love and respect. "Mind" has no
color except as it considers color to exist as a thing of importance. The bigot uses all
types of "logic", theories and rationalizing to make "his case"
against other races. It is all just so much arbitrary conceptualizing, most of which has
nothing to do with observable facts.
The Inquisition Priest believes in God, Satan, demons, possession, witches, and all
sorts of absurd notions. He is convinced he is right, and he is going to ensure everyone
else follows exactly what he demands. So he declares the heretics, has them tortured or
murdered, "saves souls", and even "feels wonderful" about the great
job he is doing cleansing the world of unrepentant sinners. He believes this and so did
many others. At the time most people were incapable of "seeing outside of" their
current social, religious and cultural framework.
Nazi Germany, about 50 years ago, convinced a large population of a major
"educated" European country that Aryans were superior, that certain others were
inferior, that it was their duty and right to bring forth the "Ubermensch"
(superman), and murdered millions of people in the process. Ironically, much of the German
psychiatric theories of genetics, eugenics, and heredity, which provided a good part of
the Nazi ideological basis for genocide, exist in modern times under the guise of modern
psychiatry. They are also now again leading to human oppression, but in a different and
veiled manner.
People always think they are right, and that they themselves, as part of the
"modern world", possess the correct worldview, and are immune to deception and
the propagation of faulty views and beliefs. If they don't consciously think this, they at
least unconsciously take it for granted. But it is occurring now, and it's
also just as true, as in the past, that a majority of the ideas believed and promulgated
are equally flawed and destructive. This modern view exists under the name
"materialism" generally, and under the names psychiatry and modern psychology
specifically as relates to Man and his capabilities.
There is MUCH to any person's ideas and understandings that follow this same pattern.
Words, labels and ideas about things impart a false sense of understanding, making an
otherwise complex universe appear somewhat ordered and sensible. We do it to the world
around us - it doesn't do it to us. We each have quaint notions, over-simplistic ideas,
and exceedingly generalized concepts, which we place upon everything we see and
experience. I should give more examples of this because most people have a real difficult
time recognizing how and where they do this, and that they do it so often and chronically.
But I will leave it up to you to take a look and discover for yourself where your own
ideas have much more to do with arbitrary notions than with any actual objective reality.
This isn't necessarily bad, although a casual examination of human history provides many
examples of where the results have been bad. Once you realize that it's pretty much
arbitrary what you decide to think and believe, well be daring, and choose wonderful and
great ideas to forward and relay to the rest of the world. And don't accept the mediocre
trash that passes daily through the hallowed halls of official academia and the mass
media. Dare to break free of the current mold - it's a stiflingly rigid and lifeless mold.
Of course, also realize if you choose notions which others can't relate to at all, that
they will place you outside of "normal reality" and consider you crazy or at
least very eccentric. People react in funny ways when you believe things they can't get
any handle on. Your best bet is to loosen them up a little so they won't react so badly
every time they encounter different ideas and beliefs from their own.
The current world is characterized by a glaringly obvious inability to tolerate
different or competitive convictions and beliefs in others. Everybody is frantically
trying to sell something to everyone else. Many believe their own notions to be superior,
and that everyone else should also hold the same beliefs. This is an interesting gauge of
the planet's level of "spiritual or mental progress". The "higher" or
more "advanced" a person or planet gets, the less they or it cares what other's
think and believe, and the less interest they or it has in demanding that others conform
to their own unique ideas, whether these be religious, political, social or otherwise.
This is also a general measure of "sanity".
The universe stays pretty much the same within the framework of human life, and human
history, and the only real variations which exist, and which also explain every situation
at any time throughout human history, are the variations in individual and group ideas,
notions and beliefs. It is Man's own strongly held beliefs and convictions, about
everything and anything, which make the world what it is. It is not, and never has been
due to love, God, the Devil, aliens, war, politics, economics, religion, or anything else
other than the IDEAS individual people have held about these things. Becoming aware
of this inner world of ideas and beliefs, gaining some personal control over it, and
encouraging others to do the same would benefit us all. It would strip various
manipulators of their power to manage and control mass belief, because more of us would be
aware of how belief works - it's formation, acceptance, change and destruction. For too
long Man's inner beliefs have been controlled by external forces, either by accident or by
purposeful design. It's time for Man to begin controlling his own beliefs and convictions
himself. You will have beliefs and convictions regardless; why not take some control and
responsibility for them? But doing that first requires a good understanding of the
mind and the nature of beliefs and conviction.
End of Section 2.
Go to:
Say NO To Psychiatry!
Back to Main SNTP Page
|
|
|
Pursuing Truth in all subjects... |
|
©Gene Zimmer 1999 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED |
|
|